Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Concord Commons Rezoning→At a glance
- Public comments
- 15
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 13, 2026.
Public comments (15)
Voiced strong opposition to the proposed retention pond location, warning that runoff and potential overflow would flood his lower-lying property.
City Council (Regular) - Jul 13, 2026 · 33:58 →Expressed appreciation for proposed developer setbacks but raised concerns regarding traffic increases, noise pollution from HVAC units, and loss of green space.
City Council (Regular) - Jul 13, 2026 · 30:03 →HOA president warned about crime, noise and transient renters near single-family homes and asked council to keep the parcel R-1A.
City Council (Regular) - May 26, 2026 · 45:24 →Asked about water infrastructure capacity and worried high-density housing could attract crime targeting elderly residents nearby.
City Council (Regular) - May 26, 2026 · 48:36 →Her property abuts the site; she urged a no vote, citing an inadequate buffer, lost green space and wildlife, and quoted council members' own green-space platforms.
City Council (Regular) - May 26, 2026 · 50:09 →Lives directly behind the site; fine with development but not high-density rentals, and worried what a future developer could build once rezoned.
City Council (Regular) - May 26, 2026 · 58:55 →Questioned whether the Land Use Plan change that enabled the project was developer-driven; the mayor said it wasn't.
City Council (Regular) - May 26, 2026 · 43:43 →Called it one of the last woods in Beavercreek big enough for deer and foxes and urged preserving green space.
City Council (Regular) - May 26, 2026 · 57:00 →Noted Eagle Point's half-acre lots run about 2 units per acre versus the proposed 2-3 times that, and asked to keep it R-1A.
City Council (Regular) - May 26, 2026 · 1:01:01 →Asked staff to identify other MX-PUD zoned properties so residents could gauge the risk; mayor promised a follow-up response.
City Council (Regular) - May 26, 2026 · 1:03:02 →Pointed out GreyFox advertises profitable R-1A projects elsewhere and asked why rezoning is needed.
City Council (Regular) - May 26, 2026 · 54:23 →Said her property will be directly affected and Beavercreek doesn't need more apartments.
City Council (Regular) - May 26, 2026 · 56:00 →Opposes businesses behind her Eagle Point home, citing noise, light, and service demands; requests a larger wildlife buffer and owner-occupied rather than rental housing.
Planning Commission - May 6, 2026 · 27:03 →Wants the promised setbacks and density limits written into the legal document, and objects to increased housing density eroding the low-density character that drew him to Beavercreek 40 years ago.
Planning Commission - May 6, 2026 · 29:51 →Opposes the rezoning over wildlife habitat, rental density out of character with the area, possible contaminated fill on site, and traffic hazards on Indian Ripple Road.
Planning Commission - May 6, 2026 · 31:26 →